Seeing as the playing field is fairly level across the board, a way to entice users is by providing seemingly unrelated features.Telegram has been gaining popularity with users around the world year by year. More can be read through, but for relevant to-date reports it would appear that in the grand scheme of things there's not really any difference, unless you want additional features that aren't to do with antivirus, malware and so on. These are the exact same results for Kaspersky as well on the AV site Protection against 0-day malware attacks, inclusive of web and e-mail threats (Real-World Testing)ģ03 samples used (99.7% Industry Average)ĭetection of widespread and prevalent malware discovered in the last 4 weeks (the AV-TEST reference set) The only thing that keeps coming up that makes Kaspersky stand out a little more is its integrated VPN, if that happens to come with the standard license I'm not sure.Īv Test ranks Windows Defender as a Top Product, which means it ranks more than 17.5 out of 18. We do choose Kaspersky as the winner in this category because of the extra features it has and the fact that you can run scans in the background.īut Windows defender can run scans in the background as well, so what are they saying? "Both of these tests showed that Windows Defender and Kaspersky detected all malware samples. Kaspersky guarantees a 100% detection rate against malware, while Windows Defender's detection rate is much lower, at around 95% to 98%"īut then you have reports done with data from sites like Av-Test which is a more reputable source saying that "The main difference is that Kaspersky is a paid product while Windows Defender is free. Google highlights the first result from some site ( Proficient Blogging) saying There are a variety of reports on the internet with varying data throughout the year, which can give perspective.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |